- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:35:11 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
On 12/10/2011 16:14, Jim McCusker wrote: > We could also set up a purl for it, like http://purl.org/w3/prov I don't see much point in that, unless you believe that PURLs will be somehow more persistent than W3C URIs. #g -- > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes< > soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 14:51, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> >> wrote: >>> Recommended by Ivan. I suggest you follow the same approach /ns/prov-o >> >> ok, will do.. with the trailing / of course. Note [1] on why its >> important to get this right early. >> >> >> Satya - OK if I do a big search-replace? Or shall we wait for the >> formal vote on the PROV-O tomorrow? >> >> >> What name should we use for the document itself, WD-prov-o ? >> >> Luc - you have gone for WD-prov-dm, right? I guess it would be good >> for these to match the namespaces, as hinted by >> http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri - perhaps WD-prov will be a >> document linking to prov-dm, prov-o, prov-aq (?), prov-primer etc. >> >> >> So my suggested changes for the ontology: >> >> https?://[a-z0-9/_.-]*/ProvenanceOntology.owl# -> >> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o/ >> https?://[a-z0-9/_.-]*/crime.owl# -> http://www.example.com/crime# >> >> >> for instance: >> >> >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/4452648d5a9b/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl#wasControlledBy >> http://www.w3.org/PROV/CrimeFile#alice >> >> (oh my, what a mess! ;-) >> >> to: >> >> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o/ >> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o/wasControlledBy >> http://www.example.com/crime#alice >> >> >> >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Sep/0056.html >> >> ) >> >> -- >> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team >> School of Computer Science >> The University of Manchester >> >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 15:52:43 UTC