- From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 11:55:23 +0100
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- CC: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On 17/09/2011 08:07, Graham Klyne wrote: > I've been reading some of the discussion of Issue 89: > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/89 > > which seems to my mind be getting rather like a counting of > angels-on-pinheads, and I wonder if we're not in danger of > over-ontologizing here. > > Going back to the original issue, I see: > > [[ > The conceptual model defines an entity in terms of an identifier and a > list of attribute-value pairs. It is indeed crucial for the asserter > to identify the attributes that have been frozen in a given entity. > ]] > > Why is it so crucial to identify what attributes have been frozen? > > What practical application of provenance is prevented is we don't > require this? > I second that. Furthermore, I don't see the point of declaring attributes that are not instanciated in the context of the entity. Khalid > #g > -- > >
Received on Saturday, 17 September 2011 10:55:47 UTC