- From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 09:46:46 -0700
- To: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
Thank you, Richard! That's great progress. All the best, Ashok On 8/27/2011 9:10 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > Three R2RML issues are still OPEN: > > ISSUE-55: Nested predicate-object maps > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/55 > > [[ > PROPSOAL: Postpone ISSUE-55, this could be considered for R2RML 1.1 > ]] > > > ISSUE-57: R2RML doesn't allow R2RML documents in RDF/XML syntax > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/57 > > As I said in another thread, there's text in the spec acknowledging the lack of consensus, and if Oracle is ok with the text then ISSUE-57 is not a blocker for Last Call. > > > ISSUE-58: R2RML doesn't introduce Turtle well enough > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/58 > > [[ > PROPOSAL: Postpone ISSUE-58, it is an editorial/didactic issue and can be addressed after Last Call > ]] > > > Fourteen further issues are PENDING REVIEW. I am fine with closing them all, but we'll have to see what everyone thinks after reviewing them: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/pendingreview > > > In my opinion, this makes the R2RML spec ready for Last Call. > > Thanks, > Richard
Received on Saturday, 27 August 2011 16:48:16 UTC