Re: RDF-ISSUE-73: IRI_REF vs. IRIref [RDF Turtle] from Andy Seaborne on 2011-08-14 (public-rdf-wg@w3.org from August 2011)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:26:57 +0100
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <4E47E941.2070303@epimorphics.com>

IRIref, as a syntax element, includes relative IRIs.

An IRI does not cover that:

RFC 3986:
URI           = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]

	Andy

On 13/08/11 20:12, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 12 Aug 2011, at 05:18, RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> RDF-ISSUE-73: IRI_REF vs. IRIref [RDF Turtle]
>
> How about renaming IRIref to IRI. That would nicely align with what it represents, in RDF Concepts terminology.
>
> Best,
> Richard

Received on Sunday, 14 August 2011 15:27:38 UTC