Re: PROV-ISSUE-38: Section 3.4: Third party services are SPARQL endpoints [Accessing and Querying Provenance] from Graham Klyne on 2011-07-24 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from July 2011)

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 08:25:28 +0100
To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4E2BC8E8.1020609@ninebynine.org>

re: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/8100a2f745df/paq/provenance-access.html

Agreed, we don't need to be prescriptive.  My intent was to suggest this as a 
recommended mechanism, not the only mechanism.  I'll look to clarify this.

#g
-- 

Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-38: Section 3.4: Third party services are SPARQL endpoints [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/38
> 
> Raised by: Khalid Belhajjame
> On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance
> 
> 
> It seems that SPARQL was chosen as a means for retrieving the provenance URI of a given resource. Do we need to be prescriptive about the kind of third-party service used to access provenance? 
> 
> I don’t mind using it as a possible means, but if I understood well the text on Section 3.4, it seems that third party services providing information about resource provenance needs to be a SPARQL end point.    
> 
> Khalid
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Sunday, 24 July 2011 07:28:19 UTC