Re: ISSUE-34, tableName

On 7/12/11 7:26 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> So my proposal is still:
>
> [[
> PROPOSAL: To resolve ISSUE-34, drop rr:tableOwner, and instead state that rr:tableName MAY be qualified to include a schema name and a catalog name
> ]]
+1

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen

Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2011 19:24:51 UTC