- From: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:05:08 -0400
- To: AUWG <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Minutes:
http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html
IRC Log:
http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-irc
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: AL to look into implementations of alt-text
association saving (B.2.3.4 Save for Reuse) [recorded in
[35]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: JR clarify for accessible templates that there may be
no instructions for blank document type templates. [recorded in
[36]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action06]
[NEW] ACTION: JR to acknowledge that dynamic content does provide a
challenge to determining a "status" [recorded in
[37]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: JR to look up what was decided about prominence and
apply it to UAWG6 [recorded in
[38]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: JR to propose conditional on inaccessible potential
[recorded in
[39]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action07]
[NEW] ACTION: JR to reword using programmatically associated or
similar term (AL may suggest term) [recorded in
[40]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: JR to reword with conditional on potential for
accessibility problems. [recorded in
[41]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action05]
Text of Minutes:
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
WAI AU
06 Jun 2011
[2]Agenda
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011AprJun/0051.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-irc
Attendees
Present
Greg, Tim, Jan, Jeanne, Alex, Cherie
Regrets
Sarah, P.
Chair
Jan Richards
Scribe
jeanne
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Extending the public comments
2. [6]Open Action Review
3. [7]Survey reviewing the AA comments
4. [8]B.2.2 - GL28
5. [9]B.2.2 - GL29
6. [10]B.2.2 - OC23
7. [11]B.2.2 - IBM53
8. [12]B.2.2 - IBM54
9. [13]B.2.4 - MS50
10. [14]B.2.4 - GL30
11. [15]B.2.4 - OC26
12. [16]B.2.5 - GG7
13. [17]B.2.5 - UAWG6
14. [18]B.2.5 - MS51
15. [19]B.2.5 - MS52
16. [20]B.2.5 - MS53
17. [21]B.2.5 - MS54
18. [22]B.2.5 - MS55
19. [23]B.2.5 - MS56
20. [24]B.2.5 - GL41
* [25]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
trackbot, start meeting
<trackbot> Meeting: Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines Working
Group Teleconference
<trackbot> Date: 06 June 2011
<Jan> Scribe: jeanne
<scribe> scribe: jeanne
Extending the public comments
JR: We have only received comments from 1 person, we could postpone
2 weeks and send a reminder.
Alex: We are still reviewing.
Greg: How about 2nd week in July?
Jeanne: I was hoping to just do 2 weeks.
Greg: We have to address Andrew's comments which missed the deadline
last time.
Jan: What if we re0submitted Andrew's comments
Greg: that would be ok.
... July 1 would be a natural stop, the end of a quarter
Jeanne: I really want to keep pushing to move forward - if we wait
too long, it won't be urgent.
Jan: It has already been May 24 deadline, so 2 weeks is a month
delay.
... maybe we should let it go. We are still making changes based on
the Microsoft comments. Incorporate the comments we have received in
the current discussion
<Jan> Resolution: Not to re-open comment period on the April 26
public WD.
Greg: schedule?
Jan: Finish the comments, publish another draft in 4 weeks and then
if there are no comments, we can go to Last Call.
Alex: I don't think this group can afford to cycle another Last
Call.
Open Action Review
<Jan> [26]http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/tracker/actions/open
[26] http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/tracker/actions/open
Survey reviewing the AA comments
<Jan> [27]http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20110503/results#xq30
[27] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20110503/results#xq30
Jan: Jutta wants this to be AA
Alex: Metadata is a vague term, when you only need an association.
Jan: I'm open to other terms.
<Jan> ACTION: JR to reword using programmatically associated or
similar term (AL may suggest term) [recorded in
[28]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-340 - Reword using programmatically
associated or similar term (AL may suggest term) [on Jan Richards -
due 2011-06-13].
B.2.2 - GL28
<Jan> Resolution: Accept the response to GL28
B.2.2 - GL29
<Jan> Resolution: Accept the response to GL29
B.2.2 - OC23
<Jan> Skip over this due to action item on MS49
B.2.2 - IBM53
Alex: Dynamic user content is the new issue.
Jan: The checker can only give status on what the checker can check.
Even if the content is dynamic, the report can still be generated.
Alex: Then it has to be in a slice of time that has to be
acknowledged and the association may not be able to be made
<Jan> ACTION: JR to acknowledge that dynamic content does provide a
challenge to determining a "status" [recorded in
[29]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-341 - Acknowledge that dynamic content
does provide a challenge to determining a "status" [on Jan Richards
- due 2011-06-13].
B.2.2 - IBM54
<Jan> Skip over this due to action item on MS49
B.2.4 - MS50
Jan: What I mean is that the program would save the association of
alt text with the image
<Jan> ACTION: AL to look into implementations of alt-text
association saving (B.2.3.4 Save for Reuse) [recorded in
[30]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-342 - Look into implementations of
alt-text association saving (B.2.3.4 Save for Reuse) [on Alex Li -
due 2011-06-13].
Jeanne: Every clipboard gallery that I have worked with saves the
title of the image - if for no other reason than for searching.
B.2.4 - GL30
<Jan> Wait for AL's action.
B.2.4 - OC26
<Jan> Wait for AL's action.
B.2.5 - GG7
<Jan> GG7
Cherie: you can ignore my commment then.
<Jan> Resolution: All accept response to GG7.
B.2.5 - UAWG6
JAn: I believe we changed the definition of prominence on the list.
<Jan> ACTION: JR to look up what was decided about prominence and
apply it to UAWG6 [recorded in
[31]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-343 - Look up what was decided about
prominence and apply it to UAWG6 [on Jan Richards - due 2011-06-13].
B.2.5 - MS51
Jan will reword with a standard conditional
<Jan> ACTION: JR to reword with conditional on potential for
accessibility problems. [recorded in
[32]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-344 - Reword with conditional on potential
for accessibility problems. [on Jan Richards - due 2011-06-13].
B.2.5 - MS52
<Jan> Wait for AL's action.
B.2.5 - MS53
<Jan> Wait for JR's action on prominence.
<Jan> B.2.5 - MS54
B.2.5 - MS54
Jan: some templates won't let you post until you have entered some
minimal information. That's what I meant by minimal instructions.
Alex: It makes sense to me here, but I won't know what a minimal
instruction when there is a blank template.
Jan: As soon as it reaches the point of publishing, that is when we
have to test it.
... in the case of blank templates, there would be no instructions
<Jan> ACTION: JR clarify for accessible templates that there may be
no instructions for blank document type templates. [recorded in
[33]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action06]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-345 - Clarify for accessible templates
that there may be no instructions for blank document type templates.
[on Jan Richards - due 2011-06-13].
B.2.5 - MS55
<Jan> ACTION: JR to propose conditional on inaccessible potential
[recorded in
[34]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action07]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-346 - Propose conditional on inaccessible
potential [on Jan Richards - due 2011-06-13].
B.2.5 - MS56
<Jan> Wait for other answers.
B.2.5 - GL41
<Jan> Didn't finish GL41...
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: AL to look into implementations of alt-text
association saving (B.2.3.4 Save for Reuse) [recorded in
[35]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: JR clarify for accessible templates that there may be
no instructions for blank document type templates. [recorded in
[36]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action06]
[NEW] ACTION: JR to acknowledge that dynamic content does provide a
challenge to determining a "status" [recorded in
[37]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: JR to look up what was decided about prominence and
apply it to UAWG6 [recorded in
[38]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: JR to propose conditional on inaccessible potential
[recorded in
[39]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action07]
[NEW] ACTION: JR to reword using programmatically associated or
similar term (AL may suggest term) [recorded in
[40]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: JR to reword with conditional on potential for
accessibility problems. [recorded in
[41]http://www.w3.org/2011/06/06-au-minutes.html#action05]
[End of minutes]
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 21:05:34 UTC