- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 07:40:42 +0100
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Graham > I am coming back to an earlier comment of yours, see below. [...] > To clarify a point here. Are you saying that a resource could be anonymous (I.e, non identified)? But by the very fact we could have given it a URI, it is indeed a resource as per this definition. Yes, exactly that! (I prefer "non-identified" to "anonymous".) That's how I read and understand the AWWW/RFC3986 definitions. #g --
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2011 07:34:19 UTC