- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:36:30 +0100
- To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- CC: William Waites <ww@styx.org>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: > William, > > On 04/05/2011 04:06 PM, William Waites wrote: >> Wanting to put this out for discussion in advance of the >> teleconference. >> >> As I see it the main reason for having graphs as a first-class >> datatype in RDF is to be able to make statements about them and to >> answer questions about them. Simple questions are things like, what >> are the matches for this pattern in this graph? Or, where do triples >> that match this pattern come from and what can be said about their >> sources? > > it seems to me that you are in fact talking about two different things here: > > * "graphs as a first-class datatype in RDF" sounds to me like you want > to name g-snaps (and your subsequent examples as well) > > * "where do those triples come from" sounds like you want to name > g-boxes (provenance) or, a "g-snap of a g-box"
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2011 15:37:18 UTC