- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:07:14 -0500
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 03/01/2011 03:22 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: > Sorry to continue on this thread, but... in RDFa Core we say: > >> The Host Language /may/ define a default RDFa Profile. If it does, the >> RDFa Profile triples that establish term or URI mappings associated >> with that profile /must not/ change without changing the profile URI. >> RDFa Processors /may/ embed, cache, or retrieve the RDFa Profile >> triples associated with that profile. > > We do not say 'the host language may define a bunch of profiles and > require they all be read in a certain order'. Is that what we want to > say? I have to say that I really hate that. Shane and I had a quick chat over Skype to hash some things out about the paragraph above... I think we settled on this language that Shane proposed: """ The Host Language MAY require the automatic inclusion of one or more default RDFa Profiles. If it does, the RDFa Profile triples that establish term or URI mappings MUST NOT change without changing the associated profile URI. RDFa Processors MAY embed, cache, or retrieve the RDFa Profile triples associated with that profile. """ -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Towards Universal Web Commerce http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/01/31/web-commerce/
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 00:07:44 UTC