- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:08:02 -0500
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 01/22/2011 02:14 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 01/22/2011 02:00 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 19:53:05 +0100, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> >> wrote: >>> 'Remove restriction on command element as part of a menu ' >>> >>> Per the decision policy, at this time the chairs would like to solicit >>> volunteers to write Change Proposals. >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/160 >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#escalation >>> >>> If no Change Proposals are written by February 23rd, 2011 this issue >>> will be closed without prejudice. As no change proposals were received, this issue has been closed without prejudice. >>> Issue status link: >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-160 >> >> Nobody ever got back to the question Ian raised in the bug where this >> issue originated: >> >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8673 >> >> He resolved it NEEDSINFO, not WONTFIX. Why was this issue created? > > Take a close look at steps 2 and 4 of the process: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#basic > > The practical effect of raising this as an issue is that those that wish > to pursue this issue have precisely until February 23rd to answer > exactly the question that Ian posed, and at no time is amicable > resolution eliminated as a possibility. > > - Sam Ruby > > P.S. I suspect that the timing was motivated by the schedule: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0074.html - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 13:08:36 UTC