Re: ACTION-472: New Mime-web-info draft

I believe a registry implies some oversight.
All the best, Ashok

On 1/28/2011 3:28 PM, Jonathan Rees wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Nathan<nathan@webr3.org>  wrote:
>> This is possibly a stupid question, but why even have a registry, surely we
>> could just use the URI of the spec (dated/versioned)?
> Not a stupid question at all.  The TAG even has a name for the
> question: ISSUE-50. (Oddly, the issue's home page has a URI, but the
> issue itself doesn't have a URI.)
>
> Jonathan
>

Received on Friday, 28 January 2011 23:47:42 UTC