- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:45:07 +0100
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Toby Inkster wrote:
> How about:
>
> """
> After processing, the following triples will be generated:
>
> _:john foaf:mbox <mailto:john@example.org> .
> _:sue foaf:mbox <mailto:sue@example.org> .
> _:john foaf:knows _:sue .
>
> The blank node identifiers ("_:john" and "_:sue") are arbitrary and
> implementations are not required to maintain the same identifiers as
> occur in the RDFa markup. The above data could have equivalently been
> represented as:
>
> _:a foaf:mbox <mailto:john@example.org> .
> _:b foaf:mbox <mailto:sue@example.org> .
> _:a foaf:knows _:b .
>
> For clarity, this document retains blank node identifiers in examples,
> but developers must not rely on RDFa implementations returning
> identifiers that are consistent with the RDFa markup.
> """
>
+1 from me - perfectly clear imho
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2010 20:46:03 UTC