- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:16:46 -0400
- To: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
- CC: HTML WG Public List <public-html@w3.org>
On 10/14/2010 03:05 PM, Cynthia Shelly wrote: > I have a question for the chairs about the survey on Issues 74 and 105 > with respect to issue 131. > > As I understand the issues, question #4 on the survey [1], “Objections > to adding advisory text explaining how to use the focus rect API for > efficient caret position notification, and change nothing else?” is a > counter-proposal to the proposal covered in 131 [2] to add a caret API > and focus rectangle handling. It seems odd to me to survey question 4 > now, while deferring the proposal it counters. Perhaps we should include > question 4 in issue 131 and remove it from the current survey? Anybody object to me taking question 4 off of the survey and incorporating it into the resolution of issue 131? > Thanks, > > Cynthia > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-74-and-105-objection-poll/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/131 - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 19:17:15 UTC