- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 22:36:29 -0500
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
It is definitely a special curie prefix. Where do you think we should indicate this within RDFa Core? On 10/3/2010 3:06 PM, Toby Inkster wrote: > On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 13:08:22 -0400 > Manu Sporny<msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > >> The argument of whether or not "_:abc" is a true URI or whether it >> is merely a mapping to RDF's "_" mechanism was discussed as well. > While we're clear that it *semantically* maps to the RDF concept of > blank nodes, I do think it would be useful if we could indicate how it > is treated *syntactically* - i.e. is it a special CURIE prefix, or a > special URI scheme? This is important as the former can be used as part > of the Safe CURIE syntax (wrapped with brackets) whereas the latter > must not. > > I think in RDFa 1.0, it was treated as a special CURIE prefix. > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 03:37:19 UTC