- From: Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:14:44 +0200
- To: Semantic Sensor Network Incubator Group WG <public-xg-ssn@w3.org>
- CC: Semantic Sensor Network Incubator Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
El 07/06/10 16:41, Semantic Sensor Network Incubator Group Issue Tracker escribió: > > ISSUE-7 (Doc format/generation): Documentation format - Generation of documentation derived from the OWL file > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/track/issues/7 > > Raised by: Laurent Lefort > On product: > > There is a range of options to document an ontology like: > http://ivan-herman.name/2010/05/28/self-documenting-vocabularies-using-rdfa/ > http://trdf.sourceforge.net/provenance/ns.html > http://rdfs.org/sioc/spec/ > http://idi.fundacionctic.org/muo/muo-vocab.html > > Some projects have developed specific tools to automatically generate an HTML file out of the OWL using a purpose-made template e,g, SpecGen http://forge.morfeo-project.org/wiki_en/index.php/SpecGen > (note: there may be more recent versions of it maintained elsewhere or embedded in another tool). > > Issue/Questions: > Which documentation format should the XG use? > Should the SSN XG use such a specgen-like tool and if so which one? Hi everyone, Some ontology engineering tools also provide documentation capabilities, such as the OWLDoc plugin of Protégé (inspired by Javadoc): http://code.google.com/p/co-ode-owl-plugins/wiki/OWLDoc or the OWLDoc plugin of the NeOn Toolkit (inspired by the previous plugin): http://neon-toolkit.org/wiki/OWLDoc Kind regards, -- Dr. Raúl García Castro http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/~rgarcia/ Ontology Engineering Group (http://www.oeg-upm.net/) Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Campus de Montegancedo, s/n - Boadilla del Monte - 28660 Madrid Phone: +34 91 336 36 70 - Fax: +34 91 352 48 19
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 07:15:42 UTC