- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 19:21:41 -0400
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 05/12/2010 07:02 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Maciej Stachowiak<mjs@apple.com> wrote: >> If you would feel you can add information by stating an objection in the context of the poll, then feel free to do so. Obviously, there is nothing wrong with agreeing with yourself. > > So, given that I strongly agree with the CP I participated in, and > strongly disagree with the other, but I think all the relevant > arguments in the one I disagree with are answered in the one I helped > write, is there any reason for me to respond in any way? > > (I had assumed no.) A change proposal is only required to have a summary, rationale, proposal details, and impact. Note that there is no specific requirement that a change proposal contains any objections. At this point, we are specifically looking for objections. We are merely doing that for completeness. If you believe that your objections are accurately and completely described by one of the change proposals, there is no need to reply further. If, however, you have anything to add in terms of an objection, now would be a good time to indicate what your objection might be. > ~TJ - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 23:22:17 UTC