- From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:12:22 -0700
- To: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
- CC: pling <public-pling@w3.org>
> identifier - a URI linking to a machine-readable description of the policy This would contain policy attributes such as expiration date, etc. Correct? All the best, Ashok Renato Iannella wrote: > On 29 Apr 2010, at 01:34, Rigo Wenning wrote: > > >> What is the opinion of >> PLING? Should we accept there suggestion? If No, what should we suggest >> instead? >> > > Rigo, I would recommend that they merge ma:copyright and ma:policy (as they overlap semantically) into ma:policy, with these attributes: > > ma:policy.statement > ma:policy.identifier > ma:policy.issuer > ma:policy.type > > statement - a human-readable (text) description of the policy > identifier - a URI linking to a machine-readable description of the policy > issuer - an identifier of the issuer of the policy > type - the category of the policy (possible values: license, access, privacy) > > *Any other types we should recommend? > > Examples: > > ma:policy[0].statement = "Copyright W3C 2010" > > ma:policy[1].identifier = "http://p3pbook.com/examples/10-4.xml" > ma:policy[1].issuer = "P3P Book Inc" > ma:policy[1].type = "privacy" > > ma:policy[2].identifier = "http://odrl.net/license/license.xml" > ma:policy[2].issuer = "http://odrl.net/" > ma:policy[2].type = "license" > > > > Cheers... Renato Iannella > NICTA > > > The information in this e-mail may be confidential and subject to legal professional privilege and/or copyright. National ICT Australia Limited accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments. > >
Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 14:13:56 UTC