Re: TWO Change proposals for ISSUE-41 : Distributed Extensibility

On 16.03.2010 05:48, Ian Hickson wrote:
> ...
> -w3c-pattern. (In fact I would argue that standards organisations
> extending the language happens so rarely that it would be significantly
> better for such occasions to involve communication with the HTML WG such
> that clashes in syntax and direction are avoided by design.)
> ...

a) Defining an extensibility model should take avoiding syntax clashes 
into account.

b) Clarifying: so you assume that there'll always be an HTML WG to 
coordinate this?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 09:34:36 UTC