Re: ACTION-149 - updated test cases

As per Phil's comment on up update to test cases as per ACTION-142, my
application was incomplete, and I had a new action to complete it.

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/149

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html.diff?f=h&r1=text&tr1=1.18&r2=text&tr2=1.19&f=h

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.xml.diff?f=h&r1=text&tr1=1.15&r2=text&tr2=1.16&f=h

This completes my work on ACTION-149

-Eric.

On 03/01/2010 04:38 PM, Phil Adams wrote:
> Eric,
> I think the information in the "Message Flows" section of each of
> those testcases needs to be updated as well.   They both still refer
> to the "old" replyToName value.
>
> Phil
>
>
> From: 	Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
> To: 	SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
> Date: 	03/01/2010 05:56 PM
> Subject: 	ACTION-142 - updated test cases
> Sent by: 	public-soap-jms-request@w3.org
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> As per http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/142
>
> I've updated:
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html#test0006
> and
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html#test0007
>
> by removing the replyToName from the binding elements.  In the case of
> test0006, I updated "GoodReplyQueue" to "AReplyQueue".  In the case of
> test0007, I added an identical entry to the updated test0006.
>
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html.diff?f=h&r1=text&tr1=1.16&r2=text&tr2=1.15&f=h
> <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html.diff?f=h&r1=text&tr1=1.16&r2=text&tr2=1.15&f=h>
>
> -Eric.
>
>