Re: Feedback from FOMS

> I don't think this section is ready, but encouraging experimental
> implementations and soliciting feedback is one of the best ways to make
> it better. As far as I can see the syntax for the new HTTP headers isn't
> defined anywhere. We would also need processing rules for how a client
> should generate the output (perhaps just "must be a valid production of
> the foo syntax") and how the server is to interpret them (hooking into
> and probably tweaking the processing sections I added).

A agree.
Regarding the syntax for the HTTP headers, we rely on a given action: 
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/123 to Yves :-)

   Raphaël

-- 
Raphaël Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/

Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 11:23:03 UTC