Re: ReSpec fixes from Max Froumentin on 2009-12-03 (public-device-apis@w3.org from December 2009)

From: Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:47:38 +0100
To: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
CC: public-device-apis@w3.org
Message-ID: <4B17B36A.1020002@opera.com>

On 03/12/2009 13:37, Robin Berjon wrote:
> More fixes:
>
>    - IDL arrays are now supported
>    - optional is now supported
>    - leading whitespace is trimmed from examples
>
> This addresses: ISSUE-49, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-50.

Thanks. Small nitpicking not warranting an issue:
can we remove the "in" keyword, given that it's optional and doesn't 
serve any purpose? Or at least leave it to the spec editor, i.e.
when I declare a method without "in" reSpec should not add it.

Max.

Received on Thursday, 3 December 2009 12:48:12 UTC