- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:46:54 +0200
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Aug 31, 2009, at 14:38, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> Henri Sivonen wrote: >>> ... >>> Now I'm confused by your argument. Why do *recipients* need anything >>> more than the processing requirements given by HTML5? >>> ... >> >> Not everything is a processing requirement (for instance, when an >> element carries certain semantics which do not actually affect >> processing in a UA). > > > What are semantics that don't trigger any observable processing in any > UA good for? When you say "recipient", do you mean a person or a piece > of software? It might trigger observable processing in *some* recipients. Are you trying to say that we should remove all "semantic" elements if they do not have precise UA processing requirements? BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 11:47:36 UTC