- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:45:05 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > ... >> No. Anything in an RFC is normative unless it's explicitly stated >> otherwise. > > I see. Earlier this month you did not disagree with me on this: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/1195.html > ... I did disagree, but did not feel worth mentioning it. > Can you answer my questions assuming the last sentence is dropped. That > is, why is this a requirement for media type registrations and where is > that documented? I don't know whether it's documented (and where), but I think it's obvious as the media type is supposed to describe existing content as well. BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 11:45:52 UTC