- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:37:01 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Aug 25, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > >> Closing the issue (this thread) means that we have consensus that the >> issue has been resolved or will not be resolved. I am not the one >> suggesting it be closed at this time. > > Neither am I, actually. To recap: I'm the one who originally suggested it should be closed, on the basis that there was in fact a media type registration. At that point, several people brought up issues with HTML5, where they felt certain elements and attributes from prior versions were insufficiently defined. Roy raised the objetion that <a name> was not sufficiently defined, and identified a few specific points, which I believe have now been addressed in the spec. Roy, if you have further objections to the sufficiency of the <a name> definition, please let us know. Or if you object to a lack of definition for anything else. If there is an objection to the spec defining things in terms of the DOM as an abstract model, though, I think that probably goes beyond the scope of the media type registration issue. If anyone considers this a showstopper, please raise it separately. Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 02:37:42 UTC