- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 12:48:08 -0400
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- CC: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Bijan Parsia wrote: > On 8 May 2009, at 16:02, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg- >>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum >>> Sent: 8 May 2009 05:41 >>> To: SPARQL Working Group >>> Subject: [ISSUE-8] subqueries and datasets >>> >>> (Not sure if the email tag identifying the issue is useful. What do you >>> think?) >> >> A link at the top of the message is more valuable to me than the tag >> in the form ISSUE-number. > > The cool thing about using issue and action tags/mentions is that > tracker keeps track of them: > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/8 > > I found this very handy in the OWL WG. whoa, awesome. does it handle any other syntax or did i just semi-accidentally stumble on the right way of doing it? Lee > > Cheers, > Bijan. > >
Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 16:48:58 UTC