Re: Issue 161, was: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> No one has complained about it being editorial, so it's your 
> (collective, theoretically) decision.
> 
> Of course, they may complain *after* it's in, but that's how it goes.
> ...

Indeed.

Change applied with 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/576>.

BR, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 07:15:26 UTC