- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:04:03 +0200
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 09:56 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> Ian Hickson wrote:
> [...]
>>> ISSUE-20 (table-headers): Improvements to the table-headers algorithm in
>>> the HTML 5 spec
>> Michael(tm) Smith ensured that Ian Hickson follows up... last year
>>
>> I suggested that this item be closed given that we have not received any
>> feedback, but DanC objected.
>
> Let's see... that was
> http://www.w3.org/2009/02/26-html-wg-minutes.html#item01
>
> Perhaps I advised against closing it during the discussion...
> ("objected" suggests you put a question and I formally objected...)
FIW my recollection of the email discussion is that the only reason not
to close this issue was the lack of testcases.
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 10:04:45 UTC