- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:11:44 +0100
- To: Krzysztof Maczyński <1981km@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Krzysztof Maczyński wrote: > This makes me even more sorry to have misled you (as you probably > already know, since the issue is mentioned in e.g. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Dec/0039.html) by > asking to write "document" where the text should read "DOM". (D does > stand for Document, but in fact there needn't be one. I tend to > repeatedly forget that it's an API spec, not a CSS module. And it's > perfectly useful for trees rooted at detached Element or > DocumentFragment nodes.) Could you, please, revert this one change? I think you're referring to the change made here at your request: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JanMar/0283.html I have now reverted it. This shouldn't be a problem since it's only a small editorial change. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2009 12:12:26 UTC