- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:20:16 +0100
- To: Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@ltgt.net>
- CC: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Thomas Broyer 2009-01-26 12.31: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > But yes, <!DOCTYPE html> fulfills the DOCTYPE syntax, so XML tools > might very well allow you to output it too, whichever the > serialization (XML or HTML). Hence, it would be best to avoid mentioning a mark-up language in the doctype, or else one could be lead to think that there is a reason - e.g. something with the tools one uses - to prefer that DOCTYPE. Better to lead people to use thoughts on what they should use thoughts on, namely the DOCTYPE. If SGML must be mentioned, then I'd propose "about:x-sgml". -- leif halvard sili
Received on Monday, 26 January 2009 14:20:57 UTC