Re: Null change proposal for ISSUE-88 (mark II)

On Apr 3, 2010, at 3:35 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:

> Ian Hickson, Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:54:23 +0000 (UTC):
>   […]
>> RATIONALE
>  […]
>> The same change proposal also suggests a second change, namely to  
>> change
>> the syntax to allow multiple comma-separated language codes, even  
>> though
>> all but the first would be ignored.
>>
>> User agents do not pay any attention to values after the first.
>
> Incorrect: Except Mozilla browsers (which looks at *all* the language
> tags in the list), user agents do not pay attention to <meta>
> content-language at all when it contains a comma-separated list.

Do you have a test case that demonstrates this? Seems like that would  
be a useful addition to the discussion.

Regards,
Maciej

Received on Saturday, 3 April 2010 16:18:14 UTC