Re: <UL> cited as <OL> (was : [css3-webfonts] Downloaded fonts should not...) from fantasai on 2008-04-10 (www-style@w3.org from April 2008)

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:52:26 -0700
To: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
CC: Ambrose Li <ambrose.li@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <47FE53DA.5070204@inkedblade.net>

Philip TAYLOR wrote:
> 
> Apropos of an earlier discussion, here is an
> interesting (and perhaps classic) example of
> an unordered list (as perceived by its author)
> being cited as an ordered list by a commentator :

Philip, this is off-topic. (And besides, restyling <ul>
with numbers is perfectly reasonable: in that case
they function as labels rather than to emphasize the
inherent order.)

~fantasai

Received on Thursday, 10 April 2008 17:53:19 UTC