Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-01-16

Regrets.

serge

Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
> 
>         Web Security Context (WSC) Call Agenda
> 
> Calling information:
> Wednesday, 16 January 2008
> 11:00 am - 12:30 pm Eastern time
> _http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings_
> _http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20080116_ 
> <http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20071031>
> 
> 
> Agenda
> 
> 1) Pick a scribe
> _http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/cheatsheet#Scribing_
> _http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/scribes_
> 
> 2. Approve mintues from meetings
> http://www.w3.org/2008/01/09-wsc-minutes.html
> 
> 3) Weekly completed action items
> [Pending review] ACTION-214: Bill Doyle to solicit commentary on Threat 
> Trees from MITRE INFOSEC community - due 2007-12-30
> [Pending review] ACTION-353: Johnathan Nightingale to Convert his fwpd 
> review notes into issues against the document - due 2008-01-04
> 
> 4) Open Action Items
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Jan/0150.html
> 
> 5) Action items closed due to inactivity
> None, but a lot of frustration with people who ignore their action item 
> due dates.
> 
> 6) Agenda bashing
> 
> 7) ISSUE-128 - Strong / weak algorithms?
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/128
> I can't believe we don't have a next step, but darned if I can figure 
> out what it is.
> 
> 8) ISSUE-124 - Safe Form Bar: reliable text
> _http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/124_
> No obvious next steps. We'll figure out what they are.
> 
> 9) ISSUE-125 - Safe Form Bar: on screen masking phrased in terms of 
> visual agents
> _http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/125_
> No obvious next steps. We'll figure out what they are.
> 
> 10)ISSUE-129 - Should we say anything about scoring techniques?
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/129
> No obvious next step, but a lot of good recent discussion. It's time to 
> figure out the next steps.
> 
> 11) Next meeting - 23 January 2008
> I'll be fresh off two hours at the dentist; should be interesting.
> We'll do more Issues without obvious next steps
> 
> We've done a lot of review and discussion of xit. It's time to step back 
> and consider the larger picture. Perhaps a better topic for the f2f. 
> I'll do some thinking and send out some email on it.
> 

-- 
/*
PhD Candidate
Carnegie Mellon University

"Whoever said there's no such thing as a free lunch was never a grad 
student."

All views contained in this message, either expressed or implied, are 
the views of my employer, and not my own.
*/

Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 06:37:49 UTC