- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:32:40 -0600
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote: > Not really. What I was asking for was a *normative* spec that defines > the language, not the DOM, not error recovery, not client-side storage etc. Any spec that defines the language should be specifying: 1) How to parse it. 2) How to parse strings that claim to be in the language but are not. Of course an "acceptable" specification for #2 is "throw up a big error message and crash"... but is that really desirable?
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 21:32:58 UTC