- From: Simon Gibbs <simon.gibbs@cantorva.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 22:43:05 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
2.8.2 "Note that both the triple patterns involving foaf:nick will need to match, not that one of the other should match." should read "one or the other". Sections 2.7 and 2.8.3, compare the TOC and the document. The section headings are clearly inverted in one or the other place. I'm not sure which. Section 2.7 "There is no relation between using _:a in the results and any blank node label in the data graph." No blank node labelled "a" appears in the example result sets. Perhaps instead, "There is no relation between labels in the data graph and labels in the results. a, b, c, d, r, and s are all examples of valid labels for any of _:a or _:b in the graph shown." I did say trivial :-) SJG
Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 21:43:32 UTC