- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 23:45:51 +0100
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Another thought about HTTP in RDF <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2005Nov/0022> and <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Jan/0035.html>: Originally, I created different namespaces for HTTP and each of the origins for extension headers (rfc822, rfc2295, rfc2965 and nsCookie). This would be more difficult to implement, because you have to look for the schema a specific header in the request or response is defined in before you create the RDF properties / XML elements. It would be much easier to have them all in one namespace. Do we gain anything important when we have different namespaces? Another thing: when there is only one namespace, the problem with the two Cookie header definitions is gone ... -- Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2006 22:46:14 UTC