- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:59:16 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Dear Scalable Vector Graphics Working Group, From http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/linking.html section 14.1.1 [...] local IRI references, where the IRI reference does not contain an <absoluteIRI> or <relativeIRI> and thus only contains a fragment identifier (i.e., #<elementID>)) [...] It is highly unclear what this means. The symbols <absoluteIRI> and <relativeIRI> are not defined anywhere and if e.g. irelative-ref is meant to be referred to (as defined in RFC 3987) the grammar would not work the way it is assumed to work. It is thus unclear whether http://example.org/ with "http://example.org/#x" is a "local IRI reference" or not. Please change the draft to be clear about these matters. Further, same-document references (the proper term for "local IRI references", I suspect), in the context of xml:base processing have been source of much confusion and there are changes to RFC3986 on these matters which make this section further unclear. Please change the draft such that it uses proper terminology and clearly explains processing in context of xml:base. regards. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Sunday, 17 April 2005 22:58:49 UTC