- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:17:30 +0100
- To: Ora Lassila <ora.lassila@nokia.com>
- CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Art.Barstow@nokia.com, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Ora wrote: >>>I will have to take a look what exactly the UMD and Agfa folks have done. >> Dan wrote: >>I misspoke when I said that UMD was successfully using OWL with SPARQL. >> >>Note clarification from Hendler: >> >>[[ >> We have continued to support the design of SPARQL because we do a >>significant amount of work with respect to RDF triplestores and we >>very much want to do distributed triple store linking, but we do not >>consider SPARQL to be very useful for OWL as per Nokia's comments. >>]] >> -- >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Sep/0009.html > > > OK, so it is just Agfa then? > > - Ora There are Jena users who work with SPARQL or RDQL and OWL, including connection to external reasoners such as Racer or Pellet via DIG. Protege has a SPARQL tab (experimental) Andy
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2005 14:17:51 UTC