XLink 1.1: RFC 2119 conformance

Dear XML Core Working Group,

  http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xlink11-20050707/ section 3 and 3.3 are
contradictory with respect to the keywords "optional" and "should, the
latter section refers to "should" as indicating "optional" features,
this is incorrect usage of RFC 2119 terminology, please change the
document such that it complies with the requirements in RFC 2119.

regards,
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Saturday, 9 July 2005 08:06:27 UTC