- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:23:25 +0200
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
* Norman Walsh wrote: >Working groups are not obligated to respond formally to comments made >on every working draft. http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010208/process.html#last-call "Before advancing a technical report to Last Call Working Draft, the Working Group must: ... formally address all issues raised by Working Group participants, other Working Groups, the Membership, and the public about the Working Draft." http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010719/process.html#last-call "Before advancing a technical report to Last Call Working Draft, the Working Group must: ... formally address all issues raised by Working Group participants, other Working Groups, the Membership, and the public about the Working Draft." http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/process.html#last-call "Before announcing a Last Call, the Working Group MUST have fulfilled the general requirements for advancement." which links to "Formally address all issues raised about the document since the previous step." http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/process.html#last-call "For a Last Call announcement up to and including publication as a Recommendation, the Working Group MUST: ... Formally address all issues raised about the document since the previous step." >The WG discussed these comments and decided to proceed to Last Call >with the current draft. So the XML Core Working Group's position is that per the W3C Process document Working Groups may refrain from informing reviewers that their issues raised against Working Drafts were rejected by the Working Group? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2005 20:23:35 UTC