- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:11:34 +0200
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-xml-id@w3.org
* Norman Walsh wrote: >/ Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> was heard to say: >| I can't tell if the intent is that the CSS specs get revised >| to refer to xml:ID or if CSS implementations are to independently >| pick up xml:ID support or what. The current spec is kinda waffly, >| as far as I can tell... >We believe that xml:id can be implemented in each of these cases and >have taken (at least some) steps to demonstrate this fact. This does not really answer Dan's question, or what I understood the question to be. From http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-CSS21-20040225/selector.html#id-selectors http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/CR-xml-id-20050208/ could you please state whether adding text like If an implementation supports CSS 2.1 and also supports xml:id, then the xml:id attribute must be treated as an ID for the purposes of CSS selector processing. to CSS 2.1 would in some way change conformance requirements for implementations that support CSS 2.1 and also support xml:id? If it does, could you please clarify why and why xml:id does not contain a conformance requirement to this effect already? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 10 June 2005 21:10:46 UTC