- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:53:49 +0200
- To: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi Sailesh, Sailesh Panchang wrote: > Does this group have any stand and is it within the scope of its charter to > express an opinion to the WCAG-WG? Thank you for relaying relevant WCAG discussion to ERT, I agree that we should keep close track of what is going on in WCAG 2.0 and make sure we can contribute as evaluation tool developers and researchers. However, some of the participants of this WG are also in the WCAG WG and it really makes more sense to keep this specific discussion which is more about the *design* of the guidelines (rather than it's testability) there as much as possible. We should keep focusing on methods to evaluate these guidelines and give WCAG WG feedback on how testable they are (rather than what level, etc). Do you agree? Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra, Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe Chair and Team Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), http://www.w3.org/ Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 2004, Route des Lucioles -- 06560, Sophia-Antipolis -- France Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 16:53:48 UTC