- From: T Rowley <tor@cs.brown.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 13:34:44 -0500
- To: www-svg@w3.org
12.3.1/12.3.2 Allowing implementations to opt-out of implementing the SVG rendering model (ordering/transform) of <video> seems like a bad thing for both the cleanliness of the specification and interoperability between implementations. If a graphic element is to be added to the SVG specification, it should be required to be rendered according to the SVG rendering model. <video>'s "transformBehavior" and "overlay" attributes should be removed along with these two sections. 12.4 Unclear why it was felt necessary to add an <animation> element instead of just allowing <image> to refer to SVG files. 12.5 This section describes an "audio-level" property, but samples media0[124].svg use "volume".
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2005 18:35:56 UTC