- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:11:12 +0300
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
On Aug 27, 2009, at 05:30, Cameron McCormack wrote: > Henri Sivonen: >> In practice, HTML5 is designed to integrate with SVG 1.1 Full and >> any compatibility with parts of SVG 1.2 Tiny is incidental. >> Personally, I think expending effort towards integrating with SVG >> 1.2 Tiny isn't worthwhile, since SVG 1.2 Tiny doesn't target the >> same environment that HTML 5 and SVG 1.1 Full target. > > I don’t agree that it’s not worthwhile, especially if little effort > needs to be made. My concern is that fully integrating SVG 1.2 Tiny brings CURIEs, the <handler>/<event>/ev:event stuff and xml:id into HTML parsing through a back door. http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/metadata.html#MetadataAttributes http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/script.html#HandlerElement http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/struct.html#Groups I'm also concerned about textArea duplicating the functionality of having a CSS formatter in a <foreignObject>, but adding textArea to the case fixup tables worries me less from the parser/DOM POV than the above-mentioned things. There's also new stuff that seems good, such the focusable attribute. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2009 10:11:54 UTC