RE: [public-sdw-wg] <none>

+1 for this. But I would wouldn’t I! Chris

From: Simon.Cox@csiro.au [mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 10:13 AM
To: armin.haller@anu.edu.au; public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Subject: [public-sdw-wg] <none>

From ISSUE-82

> The question is whether we need an additional property for ssn:observation to represent forecasts as observations.

If the phenomenonTime falls after the resultTime it is a forecast.
No extra property required.

________________________________
From: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au<mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au>>
Sent: Monday, 13 March 2017 11:49:31 AM
To: public-sdw-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-03-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC

Please note that from this week forward we will have a two-hour meeting until further notice. As agreed in the poll the meeting will start one hour earlier, at 20:00 UTC. The meeting will be separated into two parts:

- From 20:00 – 21:00 UTC we will discuss issues that concern SSN new only, the SSN new and SSN old alignment or the SSN DULCE alignment
- From 21:00 – 22:00 UTC we will discuss issues dedicated to SSN/SOSA issues, i.e. issues that concern changes/decisions in both, SOSA and SSN

Agenda for SSN-focused meeting 14 March 2017 20:00 - 22:00 UTC<http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20170314T20&ah=1&msg=SSN%20Call>

1st hour – 20:00-21:00 UTC – SSN, SSN+DULCE, SSN+SSNX

  1.  Forecasts and observations https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/82

  2.  The dul:includesEvent property has disappeared https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/117

  3.  ssn:startTime and ssn:endTime https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/145

  4.  Specgen doesn’t generate ssn:hasProperty and ssn:produces https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/105

  5.  Plan for Alignment issues

     *   Align ssn with prov-o https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/53

     *   Align ssn with rdf datacube https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/55

     *   Align ssn with the ontology developed for the coverage deliverable https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/57

     *   Align ssn to implement best practices as defined in our BP deliverable. https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/42

2nd hour – 21:00-22:00 UTC –  SOSA/SSN

  1.  Implementation of Platform resolution https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/275 and close of issue https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/88

  2.  Krzysztof Janowicz & Danh Le Phuoc reporting on progress on ACTION 278<https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/278>, ACTION 279<https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/279>, ACTION 280<https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/280>
  3.  Discussion of options for the modelling of Processes/Procedures in SOSA and SSN as on the wiki at: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Procedure_Process

  4.  Discussion of Sampling https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Sampling ISSUE-92 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/92

  5.  Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty defined in SOSA. Action-268, ISSUE-148 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/148



Further details and dial in instructions: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:SSN-Telecon20170314


Kind regards,
Armin