- From: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:54:13 +0300
- To: ext Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: "<Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi,
On 12.9.2011, at 12.45, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
> Right, I think that if the implementation supports the battery spec, it should always expose some information about battery — even when there is no battery to speak of. The question is how to represent this? Is {isPlugged: true, level: null } or {isPlugged: true, level: -1 } enough? Is it confusing? Should we add a hasBattery field, which would be weird but accurate?
Do you have a nice use case in mind that makes use of the distinction between "unable to report the level" and "there's no battery"?
Now the spec says: "If the implementation is unable to report the battery's level, then level must be set to null." which covers both the cases.
-Anssi
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2011 11:55:00 UTC