- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:17:04 -0400
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Thanks, Paul. I added editorNotes to the 4 datatype properties indicating the intent of the chain. Is that adequate? Thanks, Tim On Jun 29, 2012, at 4:15 PM, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi Tim, > > In OWL 2 DL it's not allowed. However, most reasoners allow datatype > properties at the end of property chain. > > Paul > > > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: >> OWL gurus, >> >> Can property chains only be asserted for object properties? >> >> Protege doesn't offer a chain option on datatype properties, and it's not >> listed in http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/refcard >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> On Jun 20, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Stephan Zednik wrote: >> >> +1 as well (to both) >> >> --Stephan >> >> On Jun 20, 2012, at 1:55 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote: >> >> +1 to these properties. >> >> 2012/6/20 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> >>> >>> PROV-ISSUE-413 (prov-o-time-chains): property chains for time? [Ontology] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/413 >>> >>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >>> On product: Ontology >>> >>> (prov:qualifiedGeneration prov:atTime) rdfs:subPropertyOf >>> prov:generatedAtTime >>> >>> (prov:qualifiedInvalidation prov:atTime) rdfs:subPropertyOf >>> prov:invalidatedAtTime >>> >>> etc. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > -- > -- > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > Assistant Professor > Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group > Artificial Intelligence Section > Department of Computer Science > VU University Amsterdam >
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 20:17:35 UTC