Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]

Hook,

The strings that you mention in your feedback [1] are taken from DM,
so if this is a concern please raise an issue so that it can be addressed further upstream.

I discussed this phrasing with Luc, and we both believe that it should remain as "that".

Is this a purely grammar issue, or do you think there are larger implications for the definitions?

Regards,
Tim

[1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Review_of_prov-o_july_3_2012_for_last_call#Hook


On Jul 12, 2012, at 6:16 AM, Hua, Hook (388C) wrote:

> Noticed some that/which phrasing. "that" is a restrictive clause, while
> "which" is a non restrictive clause.
> 
> 

...

> 
> Property: prov:wasEndedBy
> - change from "trigger, that terminated" to "trigger, which terminated"
> 
> Property: prov:wasRevisionOf
> - change from "trigger, that set off" to "trigger, which set off"
> - change from "starter, that generated" to "starter, which generated"
> - change from "trigger, that initiated" to "trigger, which initiated"