Re: PROV-ISSUE-661: schema appendix of PROV-XML Note [XML Serialization]

Hi Curt,

I am in the process of finishing up this change and should have the updated pushed within the hour.

--Stephan

On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:34 AM, Curt Tilmes <Curt.Tilmes@nasa.gov> wrote:

> I strongly agree with this -- unless I hear otherwise (very soon),
> I will remove the schema appendix from PROV-XML.
> 
> Curt
> 
> On 04/11/2013 12:08 PM, Paul Groth wrote:
>> Hi Stephan,
>> 
>> I think this is a better idea as well. This allows us to change the
>> schema later if bugs arise as it's hosted in /ns like the owl ontology.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Paul
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
>> <sysbot+tracker@w3.org <mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org>> wrote:
>> 
>>    PROV-ISSUE-661: schema appendix of PROV-XML Note [XML Serialization]
>> 
>>    http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/661
>> 
>>    Raised by: Stephan Zednik
>>    On product: XML Serialization
>> 
>>    from Paul's review of the PROV-XML Note:
>> 
>>         # Appendix
>> 
>>         * do we want the schemas here? we don't do this with the ontology
>> 
>>    Stephan:
>> 
>>    I believe this was added based on an informal request sometime early
>>    during the development of the Note.  I do not remember whom the
>>    requestor was.
>> 
>>    I agree that it is probably unnecessary and is a pain to maintain.
>>      I would personally prefer to replace that section with a section
>>    that points the reader to the current published schemas.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl <mailto:p.t.groth@vu.nl>)
>> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
>> Assistant Professor
>> - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science
>> - The Network Institute
>> VU University Amsterdam
> 
> 
> 

Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2013 15:26:44 UTC