[Fwd: Re: Agenda Telco]

I am sorry i have to send regrets

Kostas


-------------------
Dr. Konstantinos Votis
Computer Engineer & Informatics,PhD, Msc, MBA
Research Associate
Informatics and Telematics Institute
Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
6th Klm. Charilaou - Thermi Road
P.O. BOX 60361 GR - 570 01
Thessaloniki – Greece
Tel.: +30-2311-257722
Fax : +30-2310-474128
E-mail : kvotis@iti.gr

On Oct 10, 2012, at 11:11 PM, "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
wrote:

> Dear Eval TF,
>
> The next teleconference is scheduled for Thursday 11 October 2012 at:
>  * 14:00 to 15:00 UTC
>  * 15:00 to 16:00 UK Time
>  * 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time (time we use as reference)
>  * 10:00 to 11:00 North American Eastern Time (ET)
>  * 07:00 to 08:00 North American Pacific Time (PT)
>  * 22:00 to 23:00 Western Australia Time
>
> Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise
date for your own time zone:
>  - <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>
>
> The teleconference information is: (Passcode 3825 - "EVAL")
>  * +1.617.761.6200
>  * SIP / VoIP -http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP
>
> We also use IRC to support the meeting: (http://irc.w3.org)
>  * IRC server: irc.w3.org
>  * port: 6665
>  * channel: #eval
>
> customized coutrynetics
>
> AGENDA:
>
> #1. Welcome, Scribe
> Minutes of previous meeting:
> <http://www.w3.org/2012/10/04-eval-minutes>
>
> #2. Issue 9 - Random Sampling survey
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2011/eval/track/issues/9>
>
> #3. Issue 1 - Discuss approaches for addressing tolerance
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2011/eval/track/issues/1>
> We have discussed about three parts of the evaluation output: (1)
conformance to WCAG - yes/no; (2) some type of score - indicative to
help "motivate" developers and decision makers; (3) report - to show the
types of issues to explain the "severity" and guide developers on how to
fix issues. These are closely linked together.
>
> Would like to discuss about confidence this telco: What do we know about
the relationship between the sample and the level of confidence of the
evaluation output. A sample is always a sample, we could have missed
something. How can we rate the confidencelevel of the output?
>
> #4. Issue 5 ? Number of pages to select in Step 3b
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2011/eval/track/issues/5>
>
> #5. Status of the graphics (continued)
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2011/eval/track/actions/5>
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-evaltf/2012Oct/0011.html>
>
> #6. Other issues
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Eric
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 21:48:25 UTC